Ultranationalism

Ultranationalism is a vicious blend of rabid militarism and fervent devotion to the nation above all else. Ultranationalists are keen to purge their nations of perceived foreign influence of any sort. Thus they favor autarky, stratification and a strong military involvement in everyday affairs to insure that the country is kept independent and "safe from outside corruption". The idea of a glorious state is the key to all things for the ultranationalist, and they will call upon images from the past to stir up and inspire in combination with a paranoid and savage hatred of the other and the outsider. Racism and other forms of discrimination are weaved into all parts of life, to further raise up and separate the ideal countryman from those that do not fit in. In order to make truth of their promises of the "great nation", ultranationalism presents the military as the ultimate tool for prosperity and greatness. Service to the state in this manner is therefore mandatory for most and deeply glorified as a part of the nation’s triumph over the rest of the world. Ultranationalism has often manifested as part of a desire for revenge against foreign enemies and uses this desire to drive the nation forward. While some differences are known to exist between each ultranationalist movement, they never differ in their mad desperation to see eternal glory rain down upon their lands.

Proponents and subideologies

Note: People marked with an asterisk are their countries' starting leaders.

Subideology	Description	Adherents
Default (None)	Ultranationalism is a vicious blend of rabid militarism and fervent devotion to the nation above all else. Ultranationalists are keen to purge their nations of perceived foreign influence of any sort. Thus they favour autarky, stratification and a strong military involvement in everyday affairs to insure that the country is kept independent and "safe from outside corruption". The idea of a glorious state is the key to all things for the ultranationalist, and they will call upon images from the past to stir up and inspire in combination with a paranoid and savage hatred of the other and the outsider. Racism and other forms of discrimination are weaved into all parts of life, to further raise up and separate the ideal countryman from those that do not fit in. In order to make truth of their promises of the "great nation", ultramilitarism presents the military as the ultimate tool for prosperity and greatness. Service to the state in this manner is therefore mandatory for most and deeply glorified as a part of the nation's triumph over the rest of the world. Ultranationalism has often manifested as part of a desire for revenge against foreign enemies and uses this desire to drive the nation forward. While some differences are known to exist between each ultranationalist movement, they never differ in their mad desperation to see eternal glory rain down upon their lands.	Bronislav Kaminski Dragomir Jovanović Nuri Dersimî Cengiz Ayhan Eugène Terre'Blanche
Stratocracy	Stratocratic regimes are, in general, little more than a military organization expending the minimal effort possible to provide civilian state institutions, in order to redirect all that possible towards the military and military-related interests. They are, in essence, an army with a state, with every decision of policy ultimately, in some fashion, supporting military endeavors, and with nearly all actions underlaid by an ideological doctrine of rabid and uncompromising nationalism. To achieve this, they are often internally characterized by omnipresent propaganda and the active promotion of nationalist thought. In addition, and in order to sustain their military administration, such governments typically display extreme aggression on the world stage, towards both neighboring states as well as those considered state enemies, for reasons of history, political expediency, or others as determined. This often results in the nation being in near-eternal conflict, armed or otherwise, which to its leaders and people is often a desired goal in itself.	Sylvester Stadler Dmytro Klyachkivsky Stepan Lenkavskyi Ian Paisley Léon Degrelle Bert Eriksson Georgios Poulos Petros Poghosyan Nagano Shigeto Long Yun Sangad Chaloryu Dmitry Yazov Evgeny Savintsev Konstantin Pastanogov Alexander Lazarenko Safa Gaziz Winnie Madikizela Théoneste Bagosora
Stratocratic Corporatism	Stratocratic Corporatism is not, in and of itself, fascist. However, it does draw inspiration from fascism's tenets. This inspiration can be seen in its organization of society into a totalitarian, corporatist structure, with the military firmly in charge. The rest of such a society is mobilized to support the military, and by extension the nation as a whole. Stratocratic Corporatism can also take on other characteristics beyond its corporatist, totalitarian structure. Such governments frequently, although not necessarily, include elements of racial supremacy. This is not usually done through the pseudo-scientific exaltation of a master race, such as in Nazism. Instead, Stratocratic Corporatist societies usually stoke their racial supremacy through invoking a national spirit or mythology. To such societies, peace is merely an interval in a never-ending chain of wars, and therefore the entirety of the nation's physical and moral resources must be forever poised for wartime mobilization. These governments frequently grapple with the issue of how to take independently minded masses and get them to look beyond their own issues and instead towards an abstract "destiny" of their nation. Compulsory membership in patriotic organizations, mobilizing marginal elements of society into the workforce, and the constant need for "token sacrifices" in the name of supporting their ever-growing military, nothing is beyond the reach of such regimes. Such nations can not lose, and the people hold faith in their governments that such statements shall remain true.	Katakura Tadashi
Reactionary Nationalism	Reactionary Nationalism, like many other ideologies, emerged from the minds of the men who endured the industrial horrors of the twentieth century. When those men returned home, they could not reconcile the grand narratives for which they had fought with the reality of the world they had shaped. Modernity had conspired against them. They found no clarity of vision, they found no unity in strength. The romance of the soldier's return was a fiction. The romance of soldierly virtues was a fiction. Subjectivity usurped certitude. As time passed, there were more revolutions, more humiliations. More moralizing from materialistic creatures that could only breed in total vacuity. More traditions thrown to dogs. More suffering for it. More of the same, though without sameness. Reactionary Nationalism proposes that nations must return to a past state of social organization in order to cast off the spiritual malaise enforced by twentieth-century modernity. This structure is typically picked from a narrow, romanticised slice of time in that nation's history, though it can also relate to methods for the violent transposition of antiquated moral norms onto colonies and other realms of empire. The policies born thereof are more frequently annihilationist than assimilationist, for Reactionary Nationalists believe that homogeneity is a prerequisite of nationhood. Reactionary Nationalism is warlike and exclusive by nature. It must be, in order to satisfy the perverted heroism it proselytizes. Reactionary Nationalists believe that they seek justice by making the world as it should be, informed by the inalienable truth that some men are superior, and some men are inferior. But the lot of these self-styled knights is to fit virtues that never existed, or to force people who only know modernity to mold themselves into figures in gilded paintings. Starved of defined ideology, Reactionary Nationalism attaches itself to a superficial aesthetic, or the image of a knight in armor, visor down, and sword upright, so that any statesman may imagine himself as an emissary of return. But the lie does not matter. The ideal unites. The romance unites.	Pierre Sidos Momčilo Đujić Praphas Charusathien Abdul Qayyum Khan Boris Shepunov
Fundamentalist Zionism	The original objective of 'mainstream' Zionism, since the days of Theodor Herzl and Moses Hess, was the transformation of the Jewish people from the abnormality of the diaspora to the normality of nationhood, in their own land, with their own national economy, accepted by the world. While primarily a product of 19th-century Western Europe's secular Jewry, even much of Eastern Europe's religious Jewry had also accepted this premise. However, as Jewish settlement in Palestine began to rapidly grow during the early 20th century, a different view has emerged, particularly around Rabbi Avrahan Yitzhak HaCohen Kook and his son, Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook. This view of Zionism, when taken to its extreme, reverses this desire for normality and instead offers a 'Zionism of Redemption'. According to Fundamentalist Zionists, the Jewish people are in fact utterly and permanently abnormal, since their covenant with God provides them with a destiny: to live according to the laws of the Torah in the Land of Israel, the biblical holy land in the southern Levant. While religious Zionism is a broad definition, with many different interpretations for Zionism, including pragmatic and tolerant ones, many of Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook's fundamentalist followers see it as a divine instrument to bring about the messianic Redemption of the Jewish people and of the entire world. The greatest expression of this endeavor is the patriotic, pioneering, religious settler. This mission, however, can only be fulfilled by the liberation of the entirety of Israel, even against worldwide opposition. No sacrifice is too great in this pursuit, and any rejection of God's plan for the world, whether by Jews contaminated by the weakness of Western culture or by foreign enemies, particularly Arabs, is akin to suicide. Instead, the Jewish people must live truly Jewish lives and follow the divine plan of redemption, centered around the people of Israel, the Torah of Israel, and the land of Israel.